Article 9. The provisions of Articles 40 to 44 of the Antimonopoly Law relating to the powers of the Fair Trade Commission and those of Articles 45 to 64, Paragraph 2 of Article 66, Articles 67 to 70, Articles 73 to 83 and Article 88 of said Law relating to procedure and legal suits, including reports of violations, investigations, hearings, decisions, suits to revoke or modify decisions and filing of accusations with the Procurator General and other matters necessary to the disposition of cases, and the rules and regulations or orders issued thereunder shall be applied mutatis mutandis to the carrying out of the functions of the Fair Trade Commission necessary to attain the purpose of this Law as well as to matters, cases and criminal violations arising under this Law, wherever the following terms appear in the forementioned provisions (excluding Article 40 and Article 41) of the Anti-monopoly Law, (a) "entrepreneur" (b) "when it deems that an entrepreneur has effected a private monopolization, or has undertaken an unreasonable restraint of trade or has employed unfair methods of competition, or when it deems that undue dispartities in bargaining power exist," (c) "such measures as provided for by Article 7, Paragraph 1 of Article 8 or Article 20," and (d) "an act suspected of private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade or unfair method of competition," they shall read (a) "trade association," (b) "when it deems a trade association has gone beyond the permitted activities provided for by each item of Paragraph 1 of Article 4 or when it deems that a trade association violated the provisions of Article 5" (c) "such measures as provided for by Article 8," and (d)"an act suspected of going beyond the permitted activities as provided for by each item of Paragraph 1 of Article 4 or an act suspected of violation of the provisions of Article 57, when applied mutatis mutandis to this Law.