SECTION I. CIVIL INTERDICTION.
222. Any person who is in a habitual state of unsound mind can be interdicted, even though such state presents some lucid intervals.
223. The interdiction can be demanded to the Local Court by the spouse, relatives within the four degrees of consanguinity, koshu and Public Procurator.
The decision pronounced on application of one of those who have the right to demand the interdiction has the binding force on all persons.
224. The interdicted person is subjected to guardianship.
Each spouse becomes as of course the guardian of the other. Where there is no spouse, the father in the house becomes the guardian, and if there is no father, the mother who can exercise the parental power becomes the same.
The father or mother can nominate a guardian in accordance with the formalities provided for in Article 165. When the nomination has not taken place, the provision of Article 166 is applicable.
Where there is neither a legal guardian nor guardian by will, or where they have been exempted, excluded or dismissed, the family council selects a guardian in accordance with the formalities provided for in Chapter X.
225. Any person, except the spouse, ascendants, des cendants, and koshu, is not required to hold the guardianship of an interdicted person for ten years or more.
226. The provisions relating to the guardianship of minors are applied to that of interdicted persons.
227. The family council resolves whether the interdicted person is to be medically attended to either in his or her own house or in an hospital according to both the character of disease and the state of means. The measures to be taken for his or her entry into a lunatic hospital or custody in his or her own house are regulated by special law.
228. The legal guardian is not required to make the report on the circumstances of administration provided for in Article 192.
229. Where the property of an interdicted person is intended to be used for his or her descendants' education, marriage or business, the authorization of the family council must be obtained.
230. The interdicted person is a person of legal incapacity from, the day on which the decision for such interdiction has been pronounced.
Any acts done by the interdicted person after such decision has been pronounced can be rescinded.
Against any acts of such person done even before such decision, the right of action for rescission can be exercised when it is clear that such person was in a state of unsound mind at the time of such acts.
231. Where the cause for interdiction ceases to exist, the interdiction shall be withdrawn on demand of the interdicted person himself, spouse, relatives by consanguinity or affinity, koshu guardian or Public Procurator.
The interdicted person can only recover his or her rights after the decision for withdrawing the interdiction has been pronounced.