Law for Partial Amendment to the Riyoshi Law Part of the Riyoshi Law (Law No.234, 1947) shall be amended as follows:

Article 2. Persons provided for by Article 47 of the School Education Law, who have experienced practical training for not less than one year, after having learned for not less than one year the necessary knowledge and technique for a barber in the barber training schools designated by the Minister of Welfare, may each become a barber under a license of the Motropolitan, Hokkaido or prefectural governor. However, the provisions nesesary for the practical training shall be provided by Ministerial Ordinance.

Article 3. Persons provided for by Article 47 of the School Education Law, who have experienced practical training for not less than one year, after having learned for not less than one year the necessary knowledge and technique for a beauty operator in the beauty operator training schools designated by the Minister of Welfare, may each become a beauty operator under a license of the Metropolitan, Hokkaido or prefectural governor. However, the provisions for the the practical training shall be provided by Ministerial Ordinance.

Article 4. When the Minister of Welfare desires to designate a barber training school or a beauty operator training school as provided for by Articles 2 and 3, he shall consult the Riyoshi Training School Designation Council. The provisions for the Riyoshi Training School Designation Council under the preceding paragraph shall be provided by Ministerial Ordinance.

Supplementary Provisions:

Article 20. This Law shall come into force as from August 1, 1948.

Article 21. Persons provided for by Article 47 of the School Education Law, who pass examinations for barbers or beauty operators conducted by the Metropolitan, Hokkaido or prefectural governor by June 30, 1950, may each become a beauty operator under the license of the Metropolitan, Hokkaido or prefectural governor. The examinations mentioned in the preceding paragraph shall be conducted according to the preceding example notwithstanding the provisions of Articles 2 and 3.